June's
Fortean Times (#341) contains my feature that unmasks the self-proclaimed Founder of Modernism "James Bathurst" - now identified as John Palfrey (1846-1921) - visionary author of
Atomic-Consciousness (1892) (and two smaller editions:
Atomic Consciousness Reviewed [1902] and
Atomic Consciousness Abridgement [1909] published with the help of his brother-in-law William Hurrell Popplestone). The odd title is listed in the 1926
Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous English Literature, and it's only now that the author can be positively identified (which was no mean feat - but I'll save the investigative ins-and-outs for another blogpost). John Palfrey was a working man plagued by coincidences (or
synchronicity, as Jung would later term it) which he often initiated himself through contemplative thought. Atomic consciousness can be seen as analogous to Jung's collective unconscious, except that it actualises thoughts as events.
Atomic-Consciousness has too many dimensions of oddness to summarise here.
 |
| Atomic-Consciousness (1892) |
The details of Palfrey's life and work appear in
Fortean Times #341 (out now - and jam-packed with many other interestingnesses!). This blogpost will offer another perspective. What I find striking about
Atomic-Consciousness is the seething resentment of its downtrodden author, particularly in the two later editions. Under the guise of "James Bathurst", Palfrey later wrote that "gradually the theses propounded [in the 1892 book] became verified in all countries, regenerating conformably thereto, the field of science, and formulating the New Psychology. Then a host of plagiarists voraciously consumed the fruits of my wisdom and labour". There is a grain of truth that
Atomic-Consciousness was rather ahead-of-its-time in its synthesis of science and the occult, but it was an obscure self-published book, and unknown to most people. What was happening, Palfrey claimed, was that his thoughts were being intercepted: "my ideas taking flight as they come, the lesser or greater in resuscitation or origination, to sickening repetition of continuance by thrice hated parasite pests in profusion abounding". He believed that the moment he conceived any novel phrases, they would be immediately stolen, later to reappear in print. The only remedy was "deeper abstraction" (whatever that means). 'Abstract' would certainly be a suitable description for Palfrey's prose in the two abridged editions.
The original 1892
Atomic-Consciousness began with a humble apology asking the reader to bear in mind that its author was an unschooled working man. By contrast, in the 1903 and 1909 abridged editions he furiously ranted in purple prose about the brilliance of his original work. He titled himself as "Founder of New Psychology, the New Age [...], the New Mysticism, and Modernism". Embittered by the lack of recognition, he blustered: "My sciento-philosophical work was the last and greatest accessible within finite apprehension; subsequent chance discoveries of manipulative wireless telegraphy, and the X rays, though of practical importance, were insignificant beside the profound problems expounded in my book".
Perhaps Palfrey is, in fact, the Founder of Modernism? The anxious coveting of originality and the abhorrence toward plagiarism is a symptom of the modernist condition. Indeed, he seems to have experienced the upheavals of modernity first-hand, both mentally, and as a physical confessed "human wreck" hailing from the Devon village of Whimple, "compelled to labour" in industrial towns, wishing himself to be maimed or injured during his railway employments simply to be freed from work. His 1892 masterwork starkly articulates the plight of the thoughtful Victorian worker - suicide seemed attractive to him. However, Palfrey was too self-regarding to champion any workers' causes: describing himself, he writes that "a man of thoughtful expression incurs from the lower ranks scoff and ridicule; so great is their ignorance" (Palfrey was, after all, gifted with an ability to intuit things most people fail to notice). Experiencing the horrors of industry first-hand, the super-cantankerous Palfrey bemoaned civilisation, and once, when observing from a hillside a squalid townscape blotting the natural landscape, he nihilistically pondered with sneaking optimism "as to whether a few thousands of particularly developed minds, with strong
will, may not cause some plague or fire to devastate 'civilised' countries". As "James Bathurst", Palfrey was able to elevate and reinvent himself as a grandiloquent philosopher-seer with anarchist tendencies, critiquing everything, obsessed by the concept of transmissible thought energies, viewing mental processes in terms of electromagnetism...
Palfrey described how the etheric agency of atomic-consciousness causes any single thought to recur - "duality" is the law. This means that coincidences occur in pairs, but Palfrey remarked that further repetitions may follow ad infinitum "if one bestows on a second or successive occurrence that thoughtful contemplation accompanying the first". To frustrate and complicate things, atoms have polar (+ / -) properties, and since everything is comprised of atoms (including the human mind) one must therefore be "positive" or "repellant" to bring about any desired occurrences (which is a self-confident state of mind devoid of any wishfulness), and not "negative" (anxious, timid or wishful) otherwise adverse influences may take effect, creating an
opposite outcome. Because Palfrey was very emotional and downtrodden, he had difficulty maintaining the correct state of mind so conducive to bringing about his wants.
William Burroughs cruelly illustrates in
The Western Lands (1987) how, when a mysterious "Wish Machine" is introduced that operates on occult principles, there is the warning: "Feed a whiny wish through the Machine, and you will soon have ample cause to whine". On the mean streets of Victorian west-country towns, Palfrey illustrated that same unforgiving principle at work...
For more on Atomic-Consciousness
, see this month's Fortean Times
#341...
